A mayor for Oxfordshire?

Mayor of London

Mayor of London

George Osborne announced on Monday 3 November that Greater Manchester is to get its own directly-elected city-wide mayor with powers over transport, housing, planning and policing.  Although we tend to think of Manchester as a single, sprawling metropolis, in local government terms, it consists of 10 separate local councils: Bolton Metropolitan Borough Council, Bury Metropolitan Borough Council, Manchester City Council, Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council, Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council, Salford City Council, Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council, Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council, Trafford Metropolitan Borough Council and Wigan Metropolitan Borough Council.   For some time these councils have been cooperating through membership of a Greater Manchester Combined Authority which represents these 10 authorities.

George Osborne’s announcement will lead, in time, to the election of a Mayor for the area with powers over a huge transport budget including bus services and integrated ticketing for all modes of public transport. He will be responsible for strategic planning for the area and will control a £300 million Housing Investment Fund.  Interestingly, he will take on the role of Police & Crime Commissioner.

This pretty much mirrors the role of Boris Johnson as Mayor of London.  Again, we think of London as a huge and sprawling metropolis but its local government is split between 32 London boroughs – 12 inner London and 20 outer London.  The concept of a directly-elected Mayor for London has clearly worked well; accountability is obvious, particularly with a colourful character like Boris.  The underground works well; the buses are better and the congestion charge has helped to reduce congestion and to improve air quality. Boris’s Barclays Bank bicycles have also been a boon for those who cycle.

What I find hugely amusing is that we are returning to a form of regional government enacted in a stealthy manner by a Conservative government.  Traditionally and, I think, wrongly, the Conservative Party has rejected the whole concept of regionalism when it should have been rejecting Labour’s version of it in the form of unelected regional assemblies.  It is pretty obvious that functional economic areas like London, Birmingham and Manchester will only function effectively if strategic decisions can be taken quickly and delivered locally.  The only alternative to strong regional bodies that are strategic is for Westminster to try to second guess what is best for an area and that will never work as well as local planning and implementation.  London could never achieve its maximum economic performance if its governance was left to 32 disparate and pretty small London boroughs.  Equally, Manchester found the need to combine the decision-making of its 10 authorities into a Greater Manchester Combiner Authority, led by Lord Peter Smith and Sir Richard Leese – two Labour politicians. The next obvious step is to create the mechanism for a directly-elected Mayor of Manchester and I strongly suspect Birmingham, Liverpool. Leeds and Newcastle will not be far behind.

Greater London has a population of 8½ million people.  Greater Manchester has 2½ million.  Greater Birmingham is close to 3 million while the Liverpool city region is some 2 million and Tyneside has close to 1 million people.  What binds them together is that they are functional economic areas, divided into several local government areas by boundaries that ignore economic reality.  What they need is coherent, strategic planning that stretches across those boundaries and could provide for strong economic growth and the power to argue for necessary infrastructure investment. I predict they will all have directly elected mayors within five years, regardless of the political colour of the government of the day.

I would like to see this political and economic devolution go much further.  There are plenty of slightly smaller parts of the country that are functional economic areas.  Oxfordshire is one such area with a population approaching 700,000, with a university City at its heart but with vibrant market towns and strong economic linkages across its 1,000 square miles.  This economic functionality is emphasised by travel to work patterns and a good transport network of road, rail and buses.  Like the bigger metropolitan areas, Oxfordshire is divided into five district councils and there is also an upper tier county council.  While the boundaries of the latter are broadly contiguous with the mapping of the functional economic area, the district boundaries cut straight across them and make no sense.  Indeed, they present a straight jacket that is suffocating the City of Oxford.  There are really two options to make Oxfordshire’s economy hum and to improve the quality of life for its population.  Either, create a single unitary county council for the whole of Oxfordshire to plan for the single economy that lies within it or create an elected-mayor along the lines of Manchester with powers and a budget for strategic planning, transport and economic development and leave the mayor to drive through policies that will turn Oxfordshire into the economic dynamo it has the potential to be but also to remain a great place in which to live and work.

I would never have dared to suggest either of these options while I was Leader of the County Council.  The large number of dual hatters would have caused my rapid downfall as Leader for advocating unitary government and directly-elected mayors are not too popular with many councillors because they would be expected to curb their powers.  Now I am too old to consider running for Oxfordshire’s Mayor, I feel a lot more able to extol the virtues of the idea without being accused of wanting the job for myself!

About Keith R Mitchell CBE

Qualified as a Chartered Accountant in 1967. Pursued a successful career in financial training and publishing until selling his interests in 1990. Elected a County Councillor for the Bloxham Division in 1989. Leader of Oxfordshire County Council 5 November 2001 to 15 May 2012. Chairman of the South East England Regional Planning Committee July 2002 to July 2005. Chairman of the South East England Regional Assembly July 2005 to July 2008. In HM the Queen’s 2007 Birthday Honours, appointed a Commander of the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire in recognition of services to local government.
This entry was posted in Politics and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to A mayor for Oxfordshire?

  1. Dan Sames says:

    As I’m currently studying this area on my MSc in planning I have found the latest developments and your comments very timely. Indeed, I’ve been coming to the same conclusions myself and will be quoting you in my essay on economic governance!

  2. Mark cherry says:

    CIA council leader-like Ian Hudsbeth talk up unitary councils as a silver bullet in political solutions to the perpetual austerity cuts that all councils across England face .The realty is austerity cuts hit council services just look at decimation of the youth service which you as leader kieth
    At Oxfordshire county council was part of that process when you were leader before your retirement in 2012 .More cuts at Oxfordshire county council will see children’s centers and early intervention centers which family’s county on could be lost in the near future,across Oxfordshire .What politicians like yourself fail to grasp if you look at the cost of turning Buckingham county council into a unitary Authority is 15 million , With a possible saving of twenty million. Do you think the cuts will than stop. The Conservative party/George Osborne has been quoted in the press as saying more cuts will come,which in layman terms more service councils even future unitary authorities will be unable to provide service that most vulnerable in society rely on. You above statement Blog in my personal opinion will cull your own conservative councillors at Cherwell Distict Council which is very surprising indeed. I feel that constituents will then lose interaction with local councillors who know the needs of the people in there divisions.

    • Looks like you penned this one yourself, young Cherry. I think you should go back to letting the Adderbury hermit write your blogs for you and just signing your name at the foot. The result would be a lot more coherent and even slightly persuasive, not to mention the spelling!.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s