West is best or west is worst?

It seems some villagers are floating the idea of forming a West Adderbury Residents Association. You can see part of a leaflet that is being circulated to selected areas of the village and that suggests West Adderbury has been poorly served by Adderbury Parish Council.

Interestingly, nowhere is there a definition of “West Adderbury”.

Does it include all properties to the west of the main road?  I doubt it!

Does it include the new development next to St Mary’s Road where there is already a flourishing residents association that is tackling some difficult issue?  Residents here might worry that their own issues could be demoted by whatever is worrying the authors of the attached flyer.

Perhaps it really includes Horn Hill Road and Berry Hill Road and not much else?

Will there be a minimum council tax band for admission?  Perhaps F and higher?  Or open to owners of BMWs and Range Rovers and upwards?

It is all conjecture, of course, and the idea may fizzle out like a firework on a damp Guy Fawkes Night!

However, it is worth looking at the composition of Adderbury Parish Council if it has represented the views of West Adderbury residents as badly as is claimed.

In Horn Hill Road, we have four parish councillors, Colin Astley, Penny Clarke, Tony Gill and Sue Jelfs.  Three of them live next door to one another and the fourth just a few doors down the road.  Just a stone’s throw away, we have Ann Lyons in Dog Close, Chris Shallis in the Bell Inn and Sheila August (newly arrived) in Green Farm.  That makes 7 of the 12 parish councillors living on the west side of the Oxford Road.

In the Twyford part of Adderbury  we have Steven Cox and Martin Rye.  Incidentally, I am so sorry to see this part of our village being called “Twyford, Banbury” thanks to the machinations of the post office.  We are one village – Adderbury – and I suspect the name adds quite a few £000s to house prices!

Finally, on the east side of the Oxford  Road, there is Diane Bratt, Rod Head and me.  I think East Adderbury was where the plague houses were located in the middle ages and some seem to imagine nothing has changed!

If we do find ourselves with a West Adderbury Residents Association, I look forward to their publishing their constitution, their elected officers, their membership criteria and their membership list.  When we have all of these in the public domain, I would be supportive of the Parish Council recognising the Association and listening to their views.  However, I am not holding my breath.  We never had any of this information for the Adderbury Conservation Action Group and I rather suspect the same will be true of the West Adderbury Residents Association.  Perhaps they are hoping the next parish council will comprise 12 elected members all from Horn Hill Road and Berry Hill Road?

Posted in Local, Politics | 1 Comment

Does Greatworth have any worth?

A number of us – blog writers and web site authors – have enjoyed the attention recently of someone calling himself David Greatworth.  He has taken some interest in Adderbury village matters and has responded on Cherwell’s web site to an Adderbury planning application.

Now the interesting thing about David Greatworth is that he does not seem to live in Addderbury and he is certainly not listed on the electoral roll.  When he made a comment on a Cherwell planning application, he gave his address as c/o a property in Bodicote but, once again, there is no David Greatworth listed in this road or anywhere in Bodicote.

So the mystery remains why someone calling himself David Greatworth should take such an interest in Adderbury village when he does not live here or, it would seem, anywhere near here.

Of course, anyone is entitled to respond to blogs, write on web sites and comment on planning applications but, when they do not seem to have a local connection and will not admit to their address anywhere, one has to wonder whether David Greatworth actually exists or is simply a nom de guerre of someone who wishes to put himself about.

It is not unknown for false news to be spread under entirely false identities and I am  beginning to wonder if the choice of a name like Greatworth is a mere reflection of an anonymous individual’s own perception of his worth?  Perhaps we shall never know!

Posted in Local, Politics | Tagged | 2 Comments

Judicial review costs recovery

Adderbury villagers will know the Parish Council successfully fought two applications for judicial review mounted by a local resident who does not like to be named and secured a High Court decision to dismiss them as “without merit”.  It cost the parish council over £6,000 in solicitor’s and barrister’s fees to fight these applications.  However, the parish council asked the Court to make an award for costs against the applicant and parish councillors have just been advised that the High Court has made an order to the applicant to pay the parish council’s legal costs.  He has fourteen days to contest the Court order so I am not holding my breath in waiting for the cheque and, based on past history, have no doubt the full majesty of legal argument will be deployed to try to counter the Court order.

I write as a member of the parish council, speaking entirely for myself but basing the statement on the information provided by our proper officer.  I do so because many villagers were appalled that the parish council had to incur such costs in fighting these applications and deserve to know where things stand.  When the cheque is banked in the parish council accounts, I will be opening a bottle of something fizzy.

Posted in Local, Politics | Tagged , | 3 Comments

The yellow disease

It is grand to see the children from Christopher Rawlins (C of E) Primary school parading through the village to visit the library or the church so regularly.  If it helps them to learn to love reading and to respect our religious heritage it has to be excellent.

However, I do struggle to see the little kids all dressed up in those hideously bright yellow high-visibility jackets, not to mention their accompanying school masters and mistresses.  The school has a super and very smart uniform in an attractive deep blue that is quite noticeable in bulk and much more attractive than the bilious yellow.  So, why, oh why do they all get kitted out in high visibility jackets to walk in a crocodile from the school into the village and back?  They are carefully escorted across the main road while the traffic lights hold back the traffic and they are kept close together as they navigate the pavements between school and their destination.  When the same children arrive at the school with their parent or when they leave, they are there in similar numbers and milling around in a much less controlled manner but they do not wear yellow jackets.  I doubt they wear yellow jackets when they go to the supermarket with their parents or to the bowling alley or KFC? I suspect this is ‘elf & safety gone just a bit barking mad and I think they would be just as safe and a much more pleasing sight if they formed up in their crocodile in their blue uniforms.  I fear some county council jobs-worth has issued an edict instructing the headmaster to kit out his kids in yellow jackets which, I suspect, the school has had to  buy.  Better the money had been spent on some books for the kids.


Posted in Local, Politics | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Adderbury Bid for Booker Prize


The Save Adderbury web site is clearly making a new bid for the Booker Prize for fiction.  The post dated 13-Mar-18 lambasts Adderbury Parish Council for planning to increase its budget (called Precept) by 8.5% pointing out that this is very much more than the current rate of inflation.  What the anonymous author of this web site fails to understand is how council tax is calculated.  The calculation is done in two parts:

  • Each local authority decides how much it needs to spend to provide services to its residents.  For Adderbury Parish Council, this is the annual budget and it is known as the Precept because the funding required is advised to Cherwell District Council which has the task of collecting the council tax.
  • The precepting authority (Cherwell District Council) then calculates how many properties there are to pay the council tax in each parish.  Households pay council tax according to the value of the property as set in 1993 and unchanged since then.  House values are classified into 8 bands (A to H).  Band D is the average level and will pay a standard amount of council tax.  Band A pays 6/9ths of the standard amount while Band H pays twice the standard amount.  The precepting authority translates all of the properties in its area into “Band D equivalents” also called “the taxbase”.  Thus 90 Band A properties are equivalent to 60 Band D properties while 100 Band H properties are equivalent to 200 Band D properties.  Once all of the properties have been re-calculated into “Band D equivalents”, the precepting authority divides the Precept by the total of the “Band D equivalents” to identify the standard sum to be charged as council tax.

Complicated?  Just a bit but the effect is two fold.  As more houses are built in a parish like Adderbury, the Parish Council will have to provide more services to meet the needs of an increased population so their annual budget or Precept will grow.  However, the number of houses (expressed as “Band D equivalents”) will also grow and the council tax charged to residents will be a function of these two movements.

For Adderbury in 2018/19, the Precept did increase by 8.6% but the “Band D equivalents” or taxbase increased by 3.4% (from 1,263.5 Band D equivalents to 1,306).  Therefore, the parish council element of the council tax for an average and D house will rise by 5% and, in cash terms means it will increase from £34.26 to £35.99 an annual increase of £1.73.  The Office for National Statistics reports consumer inflation as 3%.

Hardly worth the fuss that the Save Adderbury anonymous author is making and probably not worth an entry to the Booker Prize for Fiction.  Better to head for the Please Don’t Treat the Public as Stupid award.

Posted in Local, Politics | Tagged , | 2 Comments

Open letter to District Councillors for Adderbury, Bloxham & Bodicote

To: Cllrs Chris Heath, Andrew McHugh & Mike Bishop

I am surprised and a little disappointed that I have to learn about the Oxfordshire Housing and Growth Deal by a roundabout route and thanks to the initiative of a Cherwell Councillor representing a neighbouring ward.

I have studied the proposals which I understand are coming to Cherwell full council for a whipped vote on 26-Feb-18.  I am broadly supportive of measures to support Oxfordshire’s economy.  I believe Oxfordshire is a functional economic area with the City at its centre and prosperous and growing market towns circling it.  Oxford City is 20 miles from Banbury while Birmingham is 60 miles to the north so it is to Oxford that our immediate view is drawn for its economic and academic strength. 

Looking further afield, I believe that the Oxford/Cambridge corridor is a natural area for tremendous economic growth – a UK silicon valley – and it is inevitable that this will bring additional housing which Oxford City is so desperate to see already.  This corridor looks like (from south to north) Oxford – Bicester – Milton Keynes – Cambridge.

I therefore welcome signs that the East/West rail project is likely to proceed and hope it will not be marred by the prospect of nationalisation.  I can remember the railways when they were state run and we do not want to go there again.  We need an efficient private sector company like Chiltern to be involved.  I also welcome the discussions on an Oxford/Cambridge Expressway.  This journey by car is currently slow and dismal and anything that can be done to improve it can only strengthen the Oxford & Cambridge economies.  In addition and looking at wider Oxfordshire, the A34 and the A40 both need strategic measures to prevent the constant congestion and regular accidents that are commonplace.

I am, therefore and in principle, supportive of growing our economy through stronger links along the Oxford/Cambridge corridor.

There is, however, a major but and it relates to the villages you represent: Adderbury, Bloxham and Bodicote.  These are the largest villages in North Oxfordshire and have already taken a substantial proportion of new housing.  Some of this housing in each villages has been of a disappointingly poor quality, urban in style and resembling a suburb of Banbury or any other urban area. The housing has also been densely crammed and lacking adequate storage both for personal household items and for motor vehicles that are an essential element for villages poorly served by public transport and too distant to walk to town.

On the assumption you will be supporting the Oxfordshire Housing and Growth Deal proposal when it comes to full council on 26-Feb-18, I want to know what safeguards you will be demanding for the villages you have been elected to represent? 

Specifically, I would expect you to exact an undertaking that rural locations like Adderbury, Banbury and Bodicote will not have urban-style estates imposed around their borders.  I refer to those on the north of the Milton Road at both the Bloxham and Adderbury ends of that road and the huge estate facing Bodicote across the Banbury Road.  These three villages will inevitably sit in the firing line for more and more housing and while it is only right that they should take a few, these must be sympathetic to the historic and architectural evolution of these three Domesday villages. 

In addition, I hope you will seek to reduce the fixation for density at any price and support changes in housing policy that provide for an acceptable level of storage in new homes to meet people’s increasing levels of personal possessions and to leave garages for their proper use of storing cars.  Equally, I hope you will press for more realistic levels of parking provision, at least in rural areas, where public transport, walking or cycling to get to work, school or the shops is simply impractical.  I am attaching a proposal from Adderbury Parish Council which addresses these issues in relation to planning guidance and also attaching a proposal for your scrutiny committee to examine the adequacy of storage for personal possessions and motor vehicles in recently built estates in the district.  These proposals from Adderbury Parish Council have my full support and I hope they will have yours.

 I wait to hear from each of you.



Posted in Local, Politics | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Coffee mania

The news has been full of the debate about 2½ billion coffee cups  per annum, most of which  cannot be recycled because the cardboard outers have thin plastic inners bonded to the outer that prevent recycling in all but a few very specialised recycling centres.  This has no doubt become a topic of debate following China’s decision to cease taking our waste.  Naturally, the demand is for government action and a 25 pence “latte levy” is proposed on coffee sales hopefully to have the same impact as the 5 pence levy on supermarket shopping bags.

I should admit to being a regular coffee drinker – probably three cups most days – always black, made with a spoonful of Nescafe and no milk or sugar.  Never a very enthusiastic shopper, I rarely worry too much about brands and tend to take the cheapest one I can spot on the shelves but, with coffee, I have always looked for Nescafe and the reason is simple.  Years ago, the lefties on Oxfordshire County Council and in the days when it was horribly hung, imposed an embargo on Nestles’ products for reasons I never entirely fathomed.  I rather suspect the enterprising County Hall staff at the time retained a large non-Nestles’ coffee tin and regularly topped it up with Nescafe but I never said anything at the time and the silly embargo causes me still to select Nescafe 30 years later!

I do not share the obsession for all of the exotic forms of coffee that seem to be peddled today and which has gripped the imaginations of many members of the public.  Which brings me to my main point.  Whether on a train to London or simply walking on a busy street, there are vast numbers of people clutching a cardboard cup full of coffee.  Now, I assume they have left their home to get to the station and catch their train to work or to go to work or the shops in town.  Why on earth do they choose to pay several pounds for a product in a nasty cardboard cup when they could have prepared their own in a proper china cup or mug to drink in the comfort of their own home before leaving?  I rather think the style gurus have worked their modern wonders of persuasion to make people believe they either have not got the time to enjoy a coffee in their own home or that they cannot make it as tasty as their local coffee shop or – and this is my best bet – they have worked the same sort of flanker that has persuaded many utterly stupid women (and a few stupid men) to wear jeans with the knees cut away.  Yes, I think the coffee cup to take away is a fashion fad requiring people to be seen clutching a cardboard cup on their train journey.  Whether an extra 25 pence on the cost will thwart the designs of the marketing gurus or not remains to be seen but I do not understand what possesses people to want to carry a hot cardboard cup while walking or riding on a train from A to B unless it is some sort of cultural symbol of wealth and being “in”.  Leave me out!

Posted in Politics | Tagged | Leave a comment